In the fall of 1864 General Sherman and his army cut a ruinous swath across Georgia; and outraged Southerners steeled themselves for defeat. Threatened by the approach of the Union army; young Eliza Frances Andrews and her sister Metta fled from their home in Washington; Georgia; to comparative safety in the southwestern part of the state. The daughter of a prominent judge who disapproved of secession; Eliza kept a diary that fully registers the anger and despair of Confederate citizens during the last months of the Civil War.
#1237035 in Books 2014-01-09Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.25 x .81 x 6.25l; 1.54 #File Name: 080287083X488 pages
Review
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful. Excellent WorkBy Ron ClarkExcellent work.This book is well worth the read and has very current info on Apocalyptic Literature and resistance.20 of 22 people found the following review helpful. good start but could have been more accessibleBy Michael LewynThis book has two halves. The first half tries to explain why (assuming that the account in the Book of Maccabees is factually correct) Antiochus; the king of the Syria-based Selucid Empire; oppressed the Jews; leading to the Maccabees' revolt and of course the story of Chanukah arising from the revolt's success. The second half addresses the books of Daniel and Enoch; two books which (according to the authors) may have been Jewish responses to Selucid oppression.To begin with; even before Antiochus ascended the throne; his empire was fiscally stressed because of a nasty habit of making war against the neighboring Egyptian empire. So when various Jews sought to buy the Jewish high priesthood from the empire; Selucid officials were all ears. The last of these crooked priests; Menelaus; was unable to pay the promised bribe. So to make up the deficiency; Menelaus and his friends robbed the Temple; which in turn provoked rioting and eventually a rebellion by former high priest Jason; which Antiochus easily terminated.After ending the revolt; Antiochus begin his reign of terror. According to the book of Maccabees; Antiochus began by randomly murdering and enslaving many of Jerusalem's inhabitants. The authors suggest that Antiochus's goal in murdering Jews was to create "a feeling of helplessness and powerlessness in Judea". The empire then enslaved as many Judeans as they killed; unlike its murders; this policy was financially profitable; as Judean slaves were sold in nearby markets. In addition; the dispersal of Judean captives would weaken Judaism (as Jewish slaves were forced to abandon religious rituals) and remind pagan purchasers in other parts of the empire that they could just as easily have been enslaved.Antiochus then plundered the Temple's cultic objects. The author suggests that this theft communicated to Judeans that they; and even their God; were powerless before the empire's might. Antiochus followed theft with an edict prohibiting nearly all forms of Jewish practice and requiring Jews to adopt a number of pagan rituals; essentially remaking Judea in his image. Presumably; Antiochus must have thought that his policies would not only end any chance of a Jewish revolt; but would deter nearby pagan peoples from making trouble.Both the Book of Daniel and the Book of Enoch refer to a tyrannical anti-Jewish ruler who may (according to the authors) have been Antiochus. But the two books suggest radically different remedies. In the book of Daniel; Daniel repeatedly refuses to adopt pagan practices; but rather than react violently; he allows pagans to attempt to kill him; and is always saved by a miracle. Thus; the lesson of Daniel appears to be that nonviolent resistance will lead to Divine deliverance.By contrast; the book of Enoch (a book which purports to be a revelation to Enoch; the father of Methusaleh) states that "a sword will be given to all the righteous; to execute righteous judgment on all the wicked." This language appears to endorse violent revolt against oppression.To a much greater extent than the first half of the book; the discussion of resistance reads like a Ph.D dissertation; both in its thoroughness and its occasional inaccessibility. I am not sure whether there was any way to make the book more accessible to nonexperts without reducing its thoroughness. However; it would have been nice if the book had included relevant portions of the books of Maccabees; Daniel and Enoch as appendices- especially the latter; since the book of Enoch is not part of most Christian versions of the Bible (or any Jewish version) and is thus much less easily available.0 of 1 people found the following review helpful. Nothing "bold" here at all; as New Testament scholars ...By theoryfanNothing "bold" here at all; as New Testament scholars have always said apocalypses are resistance literature; as Tina Pippin's quotation makes clear: "happy people don't write apocalypses." Lots of sloppy eisegesis; viz.; reading into biblical passages the author's obvious political biases (communitarian) and her ideology of universalism. The author is intolerant of other perspectives; and is rather dualistic and simplistic in her stance against all empire; as if hegemonic power structures can just be replaced by a utopian vision she gets to supply. Isn't this just more hegemony?. Overall; the analysis is naive and tendentious.
