This book brings together some of the world's most exciting scholars from across a variety of disciplines to provide a concise and accessible guide to the Hebrew Bible. It covers every major genre of book in the Old Testament together with in-depth discussions of major themes such as human nature; covenant; creation; ethics; ritual and purity; sacred space; and monotheism. This authoritative overview sets each book within its historical and cultural context in the ancient Near East; paying special attention to its sociological setting. It provides new insights into the reception of the books and the different ways they have been studied; from historical-critical enquiry to modern advocacy approaches such as feminism and liberation theology. It also includes a guide to biblical translations and textual criticism and helpful suggestions for further reading.Featuring contributions from experts with backgrounds in the Jewish and Christian faith traditions as well as secular scholars in the humanities and social sciences; The Hebrew Bible is the perfect starting place for anyone seeking a user-friendly introduction to the Old Testament; and an invaluable reference book for students and teachers.
#389814 in Books Mark A Noll 2010-04-04 2010-04-04Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 8.10 x .57 x 5.10l; .60 #File Name: 0691146292224 pagesGod and Race in American Politics A Short History
Review
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful. Race; Religion; and PoliticsBy Robert W. KellemenAuthor Mark Noll is one of the preeminent historians of religion in American history. That designation is sure to grow with his timely release of "God and Race in American Politics: A Short History."Could there possibly be a better time for the release of this work than weeks before our nation elected its first African American President? Race; religion; and politics in American history have always alternated between great triumphs and shameful failure. Noll outlines this contradictory history and provides theological and cultural insights into the reasons.As the sub-title suggests; Noll writes a short history (200 pages). That is not to be confused with an incomplete history. Noll moves through the issues of race; religion; and politics from the origins of American slavery; to the start of the Black Church Movement; to the Jim Crow years; through the Civil Rights years; and onto the present. In doing so; he provides a panoramic view of what he accurately describes as "spectacular liberation alongside spectacular oppression." And he does so not in a dry-as-dust historical style; but in an engaging; appealing; captivating narrative style. Surely this is one of the most important books on religion; race; and politics written to date.Reviewer: Robert W. Kellemen; Ph.D.; is the author of [[ASIN:0801068061 Beyond the Suffering: Embracing the Legacy of African American Soul Care and Spiritual Direction.1 of 1 people found the following review helpful. The story of American Politics; without God or Race is an incomplete history.By Adam ShieldsI very much respect Mark Noll’s work as a historian. So after re-reading The Civil War as Theological Crisis I found God and Race in American Politics.Noll is primarily known as a historian of North American Evangelicalism. But this is a natural followup to his Civil War as Theological Crisis. Instead of looking at the theological response to issues of race and slavery (as he did in Civil War); Noll expands his view to take a quick survey at how Race and Religion interacted over the history of the US until the 2004 Presidential Election.As you might expect a good historian to say; the reality is much more complicated than the traditional story that is told in your 4th grade US history class. But Noll does a very good job surveying those complications in less than 200 pages.His first chapter covers a lot of similar ground as the Civil War as theological crisis. Essentially; the common reading of the bible prior to the Civil War was that slavery was a biblical practice; and calling for the end of slavery as a theological statement for most people meant that they had to reject the common reading of scripture and be accused of rejecting orthodox Christianity. And many abolitionists did explicitly reject Christianity (or at least the more orthodox forms of Christianity). But here; Noll spends a good bit of time observing that it was not slavery; but racially based slavery that was the real issue. The widespread belief in white racial superiority meant that Christians were able to accept the plain reading of scripture that said that slavery was acceptable; but not the plain reading of scripture that said that Blacks were of one faith with Whites.This became even more pronounced in the post-civil war era. Because many of those abolitionists were more focused on the restraining the institutions of government than on solving the problems of integrating former slaves into the political and social system of the US.The rise of the independent African American church was important to the racial identity of African Americans. This is a more widely understood narrative; and the shortest section of Noll’s book. But it is still important. Modern complaints about racially divided church; often ignore or gloss over the reasons for a racially divided church.It is when Noll starts talking about the rise of Jim Crow and then moves into the Civil Rights era that I think the book really starts being important. Traditional history if it talks about religion and Jim Crow or Civil Rights tends to paint a fairly straight forword picture. Noll suggests that while religion is important (and he believes that it is); it is important to different sides for different reasons.Noll suggests that post Civil War; the segregationist impulses of the Christian church still used religious language and revivalist methodology; but there was a shift and by the Civil Rights era; defense of segregation was mostly using very little scriptural support. Similarly; prior to the Civil War; almost no abolitionist pointed to scripture to defend the equality of Black humanity (because there was a wide spread belief that Blacks were literally a separate and a sub-human species.) But as African American churches became independent and started mining the depths of scripture for themselves; a new story emerged that a racially insensitive White majority slowly became aware of.Noll points out that the institutions of Christianity may not have been supportive of Civil Rights; but they were also not supportive of segregation either. There was very real problems of socially integrating White and Black culture that had been separate.And so Noll suggests that the modern political history needs to be viewed through the Civil Rights movement to properly understand it. It is not as much that the separation between the Republican White Evangelicals and the Democratic African Americans are theologically separate; but politically separate as a response to the movements of the Civil Rights era. And while the Civil Rights era cannot be properly told without the African American church; the continued separation is not primarily theological; but historical.This is a VERY brief retelling of Noll’s own brief book. So I really skimmed over most of Noll’s argument. At the end of the book; Noll has a brief theological response. And I think that Noll is both hopeful; but has strong words for the church; and government; about how the role of how race influences both theology and political leanings. Ignoring that influence continues to keep Christians separate.I don’t think this is Noll’s best book. He is clearly moving outside some of comfort zones and he is a bit uncomfortable with the brevity of his argument. But it is a good introduction to areas that are often skimmed over or not given sufficient weight. The Story of the United States cannot be told without the Christian Church. And the story of the United States cannot be told without the very mixed role that race has played. More often than not; there was a combination of Race and Religion that was really at the root of the US story.0 of 8 people found the following review helpful. Eh?By Smith CurryNot the most interesting written book on the topic; but it isn't always boring. It doesn't get my full recommendation; but it also doesn't get my full damnation