how to make a website for free
Heaven on Earth: A Journey Through Shari'a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia to the Streets of the Modern Muslim World

audiobook Heaven on Earth: A Journey Through Shari'a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia to the Streets of the Modern Muslim World by Sadakat Kadri in History

Description

William Lee Miller’s ethical biography is a fresh; engaging telling of the story of Lincoln’s rise to power. Through careful scrutiny of Lincoln’s actions; speeches; and writings; and of accounts from those who knew him; Miller gives us insight into the moral development of a great politician — one who made the choice to go into politics; and ultimately realized that vocation’s fullest moral possibilities.As Lincoln’s Virtues makes refreshingly clear; Lincoln was not born with his face on Mount Rushmore; he was an actual human being making choices — moral choices — in a real world. In an account animated by wit and humor; Miller follows this unschooled frontier politician’s rise; showing that the higher he went and the greater his power; the worthier his conduct would become. He would become that rare bird; a great man who was also a good man. Uniquely revealing of its subject’s heart and mind; it represents a major contribution to our understanding and of Lincoln; and to the perennial American discussion of the relationship between politics and morality.


#904543 in Books 2013-04-09 2013-04-09Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 219.96 x .89 x 6.05l; 1.02 #File Name: 0374533733384 pages


Review
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful. Heaven on EarthBy Van E. LangleyHeaven on Earth: A Journey Through Shari'a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia to the Streets of the Modern Muslim WorldThere is no better way to understand current events in the Islamic world (e.g. the "Islamic Spring")than to carefully read this outstanding historic summary of the origins and growth of "Shari'a" law and politics from pre-Islam to 2012. This is an outstanding read; covering politics; war; law and philosophy; once finished; you can read your morning newspaper and place current developments in the Muslim world in a comprehensive context. Congratulations to the author!Van E. Langley; J.D.15 of 17 people found the following review helpful. Kadari reveals the truth about the Islamic legal historyBy Israel DrazinSadakat Kadri gives readers a good history of Islam beginning with the life of Muhammad and continuing to the present. He focuses mostly on the development of the Islamic legal system; how it changed in remarkable ways. The basic document of Islam is the Qur'an; however much of its original meaning is unclear or no longer relevant: "most of the Qur'an's 114 chapters had been overruled - 71 of them; according to one authoritative estimate." Islamic scholars explain that "God's responses to changing circumstances meant that many older verses of the Qur'an could be legally ineffective." Muslims differ as to when the Qur'an appeared. It "was first enunciated by the Prophet Muhammad during the 620s." It is not composed chronologically; but organized according to the size of its chapters. Its name means "recitation;" and many are convinced that it wasn't written down until after Muhammad's death. Others insist that he had it written during his lifetime. Some say that Allah composed it. Others insist that it existed as long as Allah. This later view suggests that the Qur'an's content has nothing to do with divine will or earthly circumstances; it is truth personified. However; this view seems to be contradicted by its changes due to altered circumstances. Shari'a is Islamic laws; from inheritance to warfare. The name conveys "the idea of a direct path to water - a route of considerable importance to a desert people." However; it is more than that. Water is a sustainer of life. As one Syrian jurist put it: "If it had not been for the fact that some of its rules remain [in this world] this world would [have] become corrupted and the universe would [have been] dissipated." Changes in human circumstances also resulted in changes in the shari'a. As with the US Constitution; Muslim scholars differ how to interpret it. Some are open to modern interpretations; seeking how the ancients might have resolved legal questions that they knew nothing about. Others are strict constructionists and insist that God manifested his will through the shari'a; obliging Muslim judges to interpret shari'a according to its ancient no longer relevant meaning. Kadri writes that this traditional approach has "the whiff of a séance about it... (and) seems akin to ancestor worship" The third part of the Islamic legal system is the fiqh; meaning "deep understanding." These are legal decisions by Muslim jurists designed to explain the Qur'an and shari'a. Like religious leaders of other religions; they "Hypothesized fantastically unfortunate dilemmas: what Muslims should do on a desert island; for example; if they found themselves pining away alongside a dead shipmate; a pig; and a flask of wine (clue: avoid the pig and alcohol until desperate)." Different Islamic schools have different interpretations of fiqhs. The fourth and most troubling in every religion is the hadiths; the stories told about the ancients; from Muhammad on; with the idea that religious people should copy their age-old behavior. Kadri points out that most of these tales are filled with fantastic events; pure inventions; and many were written to justify certain behaviors that are not explicit in the shari'a or fiqh and are contrary to its spirit. The fifth level is fatwas. These are religious opinions issued by any religious leader and are only binding on Muslims who attached themselves to the religious leader who issued the opinion. Thus; Pakistan's schools "refused on religious principle to put their clocks forward for the summer; because the muftis in charge considered daylight saving time to be an unholy innovation." Another important example is that the ancient laws never allowed the murder of civilians. Yet; Osama bin Laden bizarrely relied on a fatwa by ibn Taymiyyah (1263-1328) to justify killing non-combatants; Muslim and non-Muslims; during and not during war. Ibn Taymiyyah decision only addressed the conditions of his time. He allowed Muslims to defend themselves against the attacks by Mongols and to kill Muslims soldiers who had joined the Mongol forces in self defense during the battles. There is no overall religious body in Islam today which decides which ruling is correct; Islam has no Pope capable of resolving earthly disputes; and; as a result; there is much disagreement among Muslims about how to act. The only certainty; as with the other religions today; is that Islam is generally more conservative today than it was in the past. Thus; for example; "The very idea that Muslims might blow themselves up for God was unheard-of before 1983; and it was not until the early 1990s that anyone anywhere had tried to justify killing innocent Muslims who were not on the battlefield. The arguments for violence are recent." The results are macabre. "After a twenty-seven-year-old woman killed herself and an eighty-one-year-old Jewish man outside a shoe shop on Jerusalem's Jaffa Road in January 2002; for example; the only moral qualms expressed by the Egyptian jurist Yusuf al-Qaradawi concerned the propriety of a female martyr traveling to her death unchaperoned."3 of 3 people found the following review helpful. Excellent readBy Autie11Makes a pretty dense and controversial subject very accessible. Really like his wry style of writing. Had previously borrowed it from the library and decided to buy it as I couldn't complete reading it in time and thought this would be a good book to keep at home for reference.

© Copyright 2025 Books History Library. All Rights Reserved.