Thomas Jefferson read Latin and Greek authors throughout his life and wrote movingly about his love of the ancient texts; which he thought should be at the core of America's curriculum. Yet at the same time; Jefferson warned his countrymen not to look to the ancient world for modern lessons and deplored many of the ways his peers used classical authors to address contemporary questions. As a result; the contribution of the ancient world to the thought of America's most classically educated Founding Father remains difficult to assess.This volume brings together historians of political thought with classicists and historians of art and culture to find new approaches to the difficult questions raised by America's classical heritage. The essays explore the classical contribution to different aspects of Jefferson’s thought and taste; as well as examining the significance of the ancient world to America in a broader historical context. The diverse interests and methodologies of the contributors suggest new ways of approaching one of the most prominent and contested of the traditions that helped create America's revolutionary republicanism. Contributors:Gordon S. Wood; Brown University * Peter S. Onuf; University of Virginia * Michael P. Zuckert; University of Notre Dame * Caroline Winterer; Stanford University * Richard Guy Wilson; University of Virginia * Maurie D. McInnis; University of Virginia * Nicholas P. Cole; University of Oxford * Peter Thompson; University of Oxford * Eran Shalev; Haifa University * Paul A. Rahe; Hillsdale College * Jennifer T. Roberts; City University of New York; Graduate Center * Andrew Jackson O’Shaughnessy; University of Virginia
#6367577 in Books 1995-01Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.75 x 6.50 x 1.25l; #File Name: 0813915368480 pages
Review
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful. a slighly biased approach to John BrownBy Gabriel Tavarezthe essays contained within Finkelman's books are well written and well argued; just watch out because they contain an anti-Brown slant. These works are far from impartial and for a history text; some of them don't follow the traditional road to research of primary source; secondary; and so and so forth. The text is excellent if are looking to read good essays; but they are not impartial.