First published in September 1992; the book traces the nature and development of the fundamental legal relationships among slaves; masters; and third parties. It shows how the colonial and antebellum Southern judges and legislators accommodated slavery’s social relationships into the common law; and how slave law evolved in different states over time in response to social political; economic; and intellectual developments. The book states that the law of slavery in the US South treated slaves both as people and property. It reconciles this apparent contradiction by demonstrating that slaves were defined in the law as items of human property without any legal rights. When the lawmakers recognized slaves as people; they burdened slaves with added legal duties and disabilities. This epitomized in legal terms slavery’s oppressive social relationships. The book also illustrates how cases in which the lawmakers recognized slaves as people legitimized slavery’s inhumanity. References in the law to the legal humanity of people held as slaves are shown to be rhetorical devices and cruel ironies that regulated the relative rights of the slaves’ owners and other free people that were embodied in people held as slaves. Thus; it is argued that it never makes sense to think of slave legal rights. This was so even when the lawmakers regulated the individual masters’ rights to treat their slaves as they wished. These regulations advanced policies that the lawmakers perceived to be in the public interest within the context of a slave society.
#2047063 in Books Routledge 2013-01-10 2012-11-16Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.21 x .79 x 6.14l; .0 #File Name: 0415580625336 pages
Review
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful. Highly recommended.By Cliff PintoThis has about got be the MOST comprehensive work I've read on India's Islamic history. The only issue I have with the book is that it doesn't go far enough into explaining the brutality of the Islamic conquerors of this land. While he does touch upon the subject of their brutality; he doesn't go far enough; which might lead a naive westerner reading the book to believe that the Islamic age of India was some kind of "golden period;" which it most definitely wasn't.However; in spite of that one shortcoming; the sheer comprehensiveness of this volume and his superb attention to most other details earns it a five-star rating from me.1 of 2 people found the following review helpful. Highly recommendedBy Cliff PintoThis has about got be the MOST comprehensive work I've read on India's Islamic history. The only issue I have with the book is that it doesn't go far enough into explaining the brutality of the Islamic conquerors of this land. While he does touch upon the subject of their brutality; he doesn't go far enough; which might lead a naive westerner reading the book to believe that the Islamic age of India was some kind of "golden period;" which it most definitely wasn't.However; in spite of that one shortcoming; the sheer comprehensiveness of this volume and his superb attention to most other details earns it a five-star rating from me.