From the centuries-long prejudices against Catholics in America; to the efforts of Fascism; Communism; and modern terrorist organizations to “break the cross and spill the wine;†this book brings to life the Catholic Church’s role in world history; particularly in the realm of diplomacy. Former U.S. ambassador to the Holy See Francis Rooney provides a comprehensive guide to the remarkable path the Vatican has navigated to the present day; and a first-person account of what that path looks and feels like from an American diplomat whose experience lent him the ultimate insider’s perspective. Part memoir; part historical lesson; The Global Vatican captures the braided nature of religious and political power and the complexities; battles; and future prospects for the relationship between the Holy See and the United States as both face challenges old and new. Updated now to include a view towards Pope Francis’ first trip to the United States; The Global Vatican looks forward to the revitalization of the Church in this newest global papacy.
#638271 in Books 2015-03-27 2015-03-27Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.89 x 1.62 x 7.11l; .0 #File Name: 1442208287678 pages
Review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. GoodBy Danny ColstonNeeded it for class; but it was well written; the cases chosen were apt and the opinions were shortened where appropriate.A bit expensive; but understandable because it is so new.0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Five StarsBy Jacqueline DennisReceived publication in great shape0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Invaluable ResourceBy JaffaneseAmericanMy review of the Munoz casebook can be found here. It's an important look at religious liberty; even though Ichabod Crane is missing. I explain here and below. [...]Originalism and Religious LIbertyby Ken Masugi / 2 CommentsFiled Under: Establishment Clause; First Amendment; Free Exercise Clause; Ichabod Crane; Originalism; Religious Liberty; Supreme Court; Vincent Phillip Munoz; Washington Irving2 Print FriendlyThe first day of teaching undergraduate constitutional law; I (not a lawyer) would take a well-regarded law school casebook; and I would ask a student to find the Dred Scott case in it. It was only referred to. Law schools have practical purposes; so why teach a case that is (mistakenly) regarded as completely irrelevant to contemporary law? Yet; unless one knows what the Reconstruction Amendments were presumably repudiating; how can one know what they stand for?When done well; the study of the law strives to articulate a realm where the passions would be conquered and only the logic of the law would rule. High purposes like this informed Tocqueville's nomination of lawyers as the American aristocracy. The originalist understanding of law would tame democratic majoritarian passions as well as anti-democratic ones. Whether this vital enterprise can be accomplished without recourse to the Declaration of Independence and other founding documents is highly problematic.Vincent Philip Munoz's casebook; Religious Liberty and the American Supreme Court (Rowman and Littlefield; 2013) offers a way for professors (including those who teach undergraduate political science and law courses) to teach the law in accord with true originalism. At just over 600 large-type pages of cases and documents; the book's distinctiveness is its chronological ordering.Tracing the fate of religious liberty requires we develop the categories such as "Free Exercise Clause: Direct Burdens;" Indirect Burdens; Free Exercise/Free Speech Clause; Establishment Clause in the Public Square; government and religious schools; and public schools. Skillful editing and selection of cases reinforce our impression that a founding consensus was lost; dissolved into bizarre sideways such as the Lemon test.His first book; God and the Founders: Madison; Washington; and Jefferson noted the founders' disparate views on religion. His scholarship serves; among other purposes; the practical need for contemporary partisanship to pay heed to the diverse views of religion in our founding.One would of course wish with Munoz that he might have added more documents to his deftly assembled 23-page compilation. Washington's Thanksgiving proclamation; Lincoln's Second Inaugural; and the Blaine Acts might have been included. But a personal favorite for inclusion would be the ending of Washington Irving's Legend of Sleepy Hollow.We all recall from childhood the hilarity of poor Ichabod's terror at his nocturnal pursuit by a headless rider; but in our maturity we need to study the aftermath. In one account; we hear that the headless horseman victim; having fled Sleepy Hollow after his frightening encounter; "had kept school and studied law at the same time; had been admitted to the bar; turned politician; electioneered; written for the newspapers; and finally had been made a justice of the Ten Pound Court." The credulous fool; fleeing his disgrace (as have other; more recent New York politicians); had sought redemption in politics; having become a lawyer; a journalist; politician; and finally a judge! Crane seems a model for the judicial activist judge--a combination of his earlier arrogance and obsequiousness; fueled by superstition..In deriding Crane's religious sentiment; did Irving; with Hobbesian humor; underrate its importance for democratic life? Did Dutch Calvinism require considerable reform before it could be made safe for democracy? Did Crane become a proto-Holmesian? He stands as a version of the theologico-political question that remains at the center of political life.Yet; despite Munoz's omission of the Irving story from his small list of documents; they are certainly well-chosen; as are his cases (especially those obscure; early ones he reminds us of). His work is not only a worthy addition to the teaching of religious liberty but to future compilers of casebooks who might duplicate his originalist approach.
