Harriet Tubman’s name is known world-wide and her exploits as a self-liberated Underground Railroad heroine are celebrated in children’s literature; film; and history books; yet no major biography of Tubman has appeared since 1943. Jean M. Humez’s comprehensive Harriet Tubman is both an important biographical overview based on extensive new research and a complete collection of the stories Tubman told about her life—a virtual autobiography culled by Humez from rare early publications and manuscript sources. This book will become a landmark resource for scholars; historians; and general readers interested in slavery; the Underground Railroad; the Civil War; and African American women. Born in slavery in Maryland in or around 1820; Tubman drew upon deep spiritual resources and covert antislavery networks when she escaped to the north in 1849. Vowing to liberate her entire family; she made repeated trips south during the 1850s and successfully guided dozens of fugitives to freedom. During the Civil War she was recruited to act as spy and scout with the Union Army. After the war she settled in Auburn; New York; where she worked to support an extended family and in her later years founded a home for the indigent aged. Celebrated by her primarily white antislavery associates in a variety of private and public documents from the 1850s through the 1870s; she was rediscovered as a race heroine by woman suffragists and the African American women’s club movement in the early twentieth century. Her story was used as a key symbolic resource in education; institutional fundraising; and debates about the meaning of "race" throughout the twentieth century. Humez includes an extended discussion of Tubman’s work as a public performer of her own life history during the nearly sixty years she lived in the north. Drawing upon historiographical and literary discussion of the complex hybrid authorship of slave narrative literature; Humez analyzes the interactive dynamic between Tubman and her interviewers. Humez illustrates how Tubman; though unable to write; made major unrecognized contributions to the shaping of her own heroic myth by early biographers like Sarah Bradford. Selections of key documents illustrate how Tubman appeared to her contemporaries; and a comprehensive list of primary sources represents an important resource for scholars.
#723510 in Books 1959-06-15Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 8.00 x 1.00 x 5.00l; .67 #File Name: 0299002047312 pages
Review
32 of 32 people found the following review helpful. A Great History of the First "federal" ConstitutionBy G. F GoriMerrill Jensen's "The Articles of Confederation" is a great review of a truly neglected form of government. Jensen shatters the Federalists myths of "national government" and the Continental Congress inheriting the powers of the British Parliament.Jensen details the beginnings of the federal union in 1774 with the collapse of the colonial governments and the meeting of the First Continental Congress in September 1774. It is shown how conservatives; primarily merchants; land speculators; and admirers of the British government; fought independence up until the very signing of the Declaration of Independence. Although they supported the colonial cause many were frightened by "republicans" and "democracy". Due to these fears they supported a strong central government similar to Britian.The radicals; Richard Henry Lee; Samuel Adams; Thomas Jefferson;Thomas Burke; and John Adams were avid supporters of Independence. The radicals also supported a weak central government dependent on the states for support and were unwilling to embrace a new national government. With some exceptions; most radicals were localist and democrats because they believed that through their state governments self government would function best. The conservatives were fearful of local government and it's democratic tendencies. Many were also immersed in land speculation and did not like the participation of the "rabble" in politics.Jensen takes the Articles from the debate in 1776 through ratification in 1781. One interesting aspect is how the eastern delegates;NY; Maryland;; Pennylvania; etc; were willing to cede the western land to Spain just to keep their region powerful at the expense of the farmers and artisans of the west. Men like Daniel St. Thomas Jenifer; John Jay; Samuel Chase; and John Dickenson were more interested in the land claims than the liberty of the western settlers.Thomas Jefferson was the most farsighted concerning the west. he proposed Virginia retain title to her claims to be surrendered to Congress only if the land was made into "free and independent states" He also proposed a radical plan to "give land to those who would settle it" thereby attacking the root of land speculation.Overall the Articles were not a "weak" government; nor were they ineffective as later Federalist propaganda states. They were the embodiment of the American Revolution; revolt against distant centralized authority and the sovereignty of the individual colonies against the centralized power of parliament. Overall a great history.37 of 37 people found the following review helpful. A Continuing Debate in American PoliticsBy Russell E. SaltzmanI don't suppose one in ten Americans realize there was a first constitution of the United States before there was "the" Constitution of the United States. Merrill Jensen is the definitive historian of that period - up to 1789 when the present Constitution took effect - and this book is one of several of his covering the topic. Reading of this period would do much to remind Americans that the debate over the nature of American government has been going on since 1776. The debate concerns "weak" central government (the Articles of Confederation) vs. "strong" central government (the Constitution). The Federalists (favoring the Constitution) won politically; but their victory did not settle the argument. Any American presidential or congressional election campaign brings out the same themes sounded 200 years ago as the Constitution faced ratification. In any event; Jensen does much to rehabilitate the history of the Confederation; clarify the agruments; and takes care to note the remarkable accomplishments of the Confederation congress. His writing style is very accessible and the book is a quick read.13 of 14 people found the following review helpful. Necessary Foundational InformationBy Larry L. BurtonIt is true. Not too many Americans are aware that the Founding Fathers called the Articles of Confederation of 1781 our; "first Federal Consti-tution." Mr. Jensen points out that they were the written expression of the political philosophy of the Declaration of Independence. If one understands the concept of local state sovereignty (or independence) as expressed in the Articles; then they will have a much better understanding of the argument between the Federal Government and the Confederate Government (1861-1865)which was only a continuation of the long argument over the nature of the Union of American States. (And; as one reviewer points out; it is an on going argument until this day.) All in all; it is an excellent read; and very pertinent information.
