Blood on the Bayou: Vicksburg; Port Hudson; and the Trans-Mississippi takes a well-known story; the struggle for control of the Mississippi River in the American Civil War; and recasts it as a contest for control of African-American populations. The Emancipation Proclamation may have freed the slaves; but the task of actually moving these liberated people into the Union lines and directing their labor to the benefit of the Union fell to the Federal army and navy. Control of the Mississippi has often been cast in economic terms. This book; by examining the campaigns from west of the river; shows how the campaign to reduce these Rebel forts also involved the creation of a black army of occupation and a remaking of the social and political landscape of Louisiana and the nation. This book is new scholarship and; most importantly; fresh research that challenges many commonly held notions of the Vicksburg and Port Hudson campaigns. In the past; the movement of large armies and the grand assaults garnered the most attention. As Blood on the Bayou reveals; small unit actions and big government policies in the Trans-Mississippi did as much to shape the outcome of the war as did the great armies and famous captains of legend and lore. No student of the Civil War should ignore this book. Scholars of Vicksburg and Port Hudson will find their studies incomplete without a thorough examination of this work. As with the other books in the Louisiana Quadrille series; the military campaigns remain front and center. I trace the movements of obscure regiments and battles fought on unfamiliar trans-Mississippi landscapes in June and July; 1863; and tell a little-known aspect of the sieges of Vicksburg and Port Hudson. I examine the evolution of Federal and Confederate strategy and sketch the leaders tasked with carrying these plans forward. There is enough combat to satisfy even the most ardent student of campaigns and commanders. The sources; however; revealed an almost obsessive concern over slavery by both sides. Actually; these soldiers; civilians; and politicians did not fret over the institution of slavery as much as control over the slaves themselves. Both Federal and Confederate authorities seemed preoccupied with who physically controlled the enslaved population. This led me to review Republican views on this subject; and especially those held by Abraham Lincoln. The tug-of-war over people—whom some considered persons held in bondage and others considered human property—also caused me to reexamine the peculiar institution as a salient feature of Confederate national identity. A greater appreciation for the causes of the war emerged. While states’ rights certainly provided a framework and context for the argument; slavery caused the war; not vice versa. Physical control of the slave population impacted how the Federal Government conducted the war. When war broke out; slaves emerged first as “contraband;†then morphed into “self-emancipated†persons; before becoming the raison d’être of the Mississippi Valley campaigns in 1863. The African-Americans became plunder; if you will. I came to the conclusion that the gathering of these persons drove; in part; Union military strategy in the Mississippi Valley. Lincoln wanted slaves removed from southern owners; concentrated in areas convenient to Union logistics centers; and then redistributed to serve as soldiers or farmers on behalf of the United States. The longer the military campaigns in the Mississippi Valley dragged on; the more Federal officials could feed liberated slaves into the system. This strategy held that; once Union troops had removed slaves from bondage and repurposed them to other tasks; it would be nearly impossible for their former masters to re-enslave them. No matter the outcome of the war; the Federal government set out to break slavery—forever. Fearing a rapid collapse of the Confederacy; abolitionists intended to make sure that readmitted states did not reestablish slavery. Remember; slavery was then a state prerogative. Passage of the Thirteenth Amendment still lay months into the future. Concurrently; Lincoln believed Black troops would help achieve victory and then secure the peace. One the shooting ended these African-American regiments might serve as an army of occupation. The largest concentration of slaves lay in the Mississippi Valley and this population needed to be under Federal control. The Rebel forts at Vicksburg and Port Hudson were impediments. Even so; despite the presence of these Confederate citadels; US troops could remove the African-American population of this region into zones of their choosing with increasing impunity. The fall of these positions facilitated commerce and navigation on the Mississippi. Yet; the great gathering of African-Americans began; and continued; notwithstanding the Rebels in the earthworks.
#675796 in Books imusti 2006-01-12Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 4.30 x .40 x 6.80l; .37 #File Name: 0192806556167 pagesOxford University Press USA
Review
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful. Crusading 101By AradorTyerman's short introduction to the crusades provides a brief overview of the events and major theatres of the crusade; at the same time he relates detailed specifics and anecdotal stories. I enjoyed reading his book; and found it to be a good balance of detail with general broad definitions. One of Tyerman's reasons for writing the book is to correct many of the images that people have in their minds of the "crusader." He debunk's the Romantic views; armoured knights were not riding around on horses defeating every foe they came across. He also dispels the lust for plunder; younger sons were not running off to the Holy Land to make their fortunes. Most people who 'took the Cross' invested huge sums of money and resources to be able to make the trip. Crusades were not a get rich quick operation. He is very careful to stress that religious devotion and penitential aspects were the main motivations for Europeans to go on crusade; either in the Middle East; Spain or the Baltic.Tyerman gave a nice brief outline of what happened in each of the major Crusades; categorizing them by geographic locations. The timeline and subject jumps around a bit; but isn't that hard to follow. I'd recommend this book to anyone who wants to get a basic understanding of what happened in the Crusades. Tyerman did a good job of making the Crusades understandable and he did a good job of undoing some negative but persistent stereotypes that have existed for a while. I've read a couple of books in the A Very Short Introduction series and these books seem to be relatively short; easily accessible; yet detailed and specific enough to give the reader a general understanding of the topic. Tyerman does just that.17 of 17 people found the following review helpful. Holy men at warBy Peter ReevePart of the continuing fascination with the Crusades is due to the belief that we are still fighting them; that they precipitated a Christian/Islamic conflict in which we are still caught up. Truth tends to be much more complex and multi-layered than myth; which is indeed why we prefer the latter. But if you would like to get at the former; Tyerman's book is a good place to start. The most important lessons are to do with scope and context. The Crusades were much more than a series of military expeditions by Europeans to the Holy Land; they lasted for far longer than the two centuries we usually credit them with; and the wars between Christian and Islamic nations had older and deeper roots. Nor are their consequences widely understood. As this book makes clear; the Crusades had far more impact on Europe; and far less on the Near East; than is usually thought.This Very Short Introduction is actually a reprint of Tyerman's hardback Fighting for Christendom (used; cheap copies of which; at the time of writing this review; are still available on ; so you might want to check that out). One consequence is that; at 150 pages; it's longer than most in the series. Also; I think they must have simply shrunk the illustrations to fit on the page; so that you need a magnifying glass to read some of the maps.The early chapters give an excellent overview of the subject. The later chapters; examining the impact and significance of the Crusades; and being therefore more interpretive; are somewhat heavy going at times. The author's style is good; but may be slightly too academic for some readers. And he is occasionally prone to colorful moral judgments; such as when he talks of Himmler's 'historically illiterate ghouls' relying on 'rancid imagination'. I may well share this view; but I will arrive at it myself; thank you very much.This remains an excellent introduction to a hugely important subject; and is a worthy addition to the series.0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. WorthwhileBy CustomerIt is exactly as advertised: a short introduction. An easy and quick read which makes you want to learn more.