Newly created territories in antebellum America were designed to be extensions of national sovereignty and jurisdiction. Utah Territory; however; was a deeply contested space in which a cohesive settler group—the Mormons—sought to establish their own “popular sovereignty;†raising the question of who possessed and could exercise governing; legal; social; and even cultural power in a newly acquired territory. In Unpopular Sovereignty; Brent M. Rogers invokes the case of popular sovereignty in Utah as an important contrast to the better-known slavery question in Kansas. Rogers examines the complex relationship between sovereignty and territory along three main lines of inquiry: the implementation of a republican form of government; the administration of Indian policy and Native American affairs; and gender and familial relations—all of which played an important role in the national perception of the Mormons’ ability to self-govern. Utah’s status as a federal territory drew it into larger conversations about popular sovereignty and the expansion of federal power in the West. Ultimately; Rogers argues; managing sovereignty in Utah proved to have explosive and far-reaching consequences for the nation as a whole as it teetered on the brink of disunion and civil war.
#2278103 in Books Bison Books 2002-09-01Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.00 x 1.26 x 6.12l; 1.58 #File Name: 0803280130531 pages
Review
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Three StarsBy CustomerDry book