how to make a website for free
The Making of the Atomic Bomb: 25th Anniversary Edition

audiobook The Making of the Atomic Bomb: 25th Anniversary Edition by Richard Rhodes in History

Description

The Bristoe campaign immediately followed the Gettysburg campaign and reflects the pressure applied by President Lincoln upon Meade to keep Lee engaged. It did not all work out as Licoln expected as Lee; for the last time; took the initiative.The book covers the actions in September and October 1863; and includes more than 60 sketch maps; full orders of battle and photographs of the main locations and generals involved. The actions at Jack's Shop; Culpeper; James City; Sulphur Springs; Auburn; Buckland Mills and Bristoe are all covered in the book.


#22818 in Books Simon Schuster 2012-06-12 2012-06-12Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.25 x 1.70 x 6.12l; 2.40 #File Name: 1451677618896 pagesSimon Schuster


Review
53 of 54 people found the following review helpful. Flawed MasterpieceBy Daryl CarpenterA quick note for anyone deciding which edition to buy: The "25th Anniversary Edition" removes the book's final chapter completely. This feels utterly disingenuous and revisionist to me. Rhodes' "Dark Sun" covers the same ground as the omitted epilogue; but this edition ends so abruptly I'm amazed there wasn't an advertisement for the other books in his "nuclear anthology" on the final page. The Kindle version is somewhat flawed; there are quite a few typos and dropped punctuation; and it's not always obvious when direct quotations begin and end. I'd recommend buying one of the older physical editions if you want to read this book as it was meant to be read."The Making of the Atomic Bomb" is a richly detailed epic; a table-shaking beast of a book that frequently sent me on evening walks to ponder and process the last few chapters I'd read. This is more than just a book about Hiroshima; Oppenheimer; and the Manhattan Project. We get an in-depth look at the early history of atomic physics; the personalities of key scientists; politicians; and military leaders; the complex political and military issues surrounding the bomb's development and use; and the historic and social events that shaped its creation. This is NOT a beach read - better put aside two weeks and plenty of undivided attention before tackling it!I first read this book back in 2001; and I was totally enthralled by it; devouring it from cover to cover in four days. Having read it four times since then; some cracks have formed in its facade. Namely; it feels like two books grafted together - a decent one on the early history of nuclear physics; and an enthralling one on the actual making of the atomic bomb. The first 250 pages; while perhaps essential; tend to get bogged down by Rhodes' occasionally self-indulgent scene-setting (do we really need to know what shape the windows were?) and rather heavy philosophizing. Things pick up immensely with the actual discovery that the Uranium atom can be split; but I can see why some people give up early on. The "making of" is told with a remarkable lack of sensationalizing and sermonizing; and as horrific as the accounts of the actual bombings are; Rhodes is remarkably nonjudgmental about the bomb's use. People looking for pointed criticisms or historical revisionism will probably be disappointed; although Rhodes clearly abhors war; he seems to view Hiroshima and Nagasaki as the inevitable climax of an increasingly savage conflict against an enemy which refused to surrender. Considering how emotionally charged most books on nuclear weapons are; I actually admired Rhodes' somewhat pragmatic approach. Then again; it might leave others cold and confused.Although it's not the flawless masterpiece I once held it as; "The Making of the Atomic Bomb" is still a pretty solid tome. It's big; multi-layered; thought-provoking; darkly funny; disturbing; richly detailed; philosophical... and just a tad over-rated. The first third is somewhat rough going; and; in retrospect; could have used some careful editing. The last 500 pages; however; are among the best history writing I've ever read. If the early history of nuclear weapons and nuclear physics fascinates you; give it a shot. You just need some patience going in.0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Very Well Researched; Somewhat OverwrittenBy S. FoxIf you are up on physics you will love this book. If not; there is enough to keep you going while bypassing the nuts and bolts. This is a long book and is technical enough that you will take your time reading it. I liked the physics because it gave me a better understanding of the process and experiments necessary to make the bomb work. There is way too much personal background on the players and alot of redundancy and I ended up skipping much of that. Skipping didn't take away from the story of the bomb; so the amount there was extraneous. The book ends with the bomb explosions over Japan. After following the story for about 750 pages I would have liked to read more than the wham; bam; thank you mam that the ending was. More than limited coverage of Oak Ridge would have added much to the story but there are other books on Oak Ridge that are pretty interesting. If you want to read more on Oak Ridge find something that starts with the muddy fields pre-construction and goes on from there. I would have liked to read something about the espionage that occurred but that wasn't covered. Still; this was an extremely well researched book and I recommend it.0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. The Making of the Atomic Bomb – Richard Rhodes Title ...By Samuel M. FeldmanThe Making of the Atomic Bomb – Richard RhodesTitle: Scientifically Accurate – Overly WordyRichard Rhodes tome deserves its acclaim as the most comprehensive history of the development of the atomic bomb. As a scientist with advanced degrees in quantum physics I can attest to its scientific accuracy. Mr. Rhodes’s has a gift for explaining complex technical details to a lay audience. I found his lengthily discourse on the lives of scientists enlightening but non-scientists might find these sidebars distracting.There is one question on the development of atomic weapons that has haunted me. What would have happened if Otto Hahn’s paper on the discovery of nuclear fission had not been published six months before the Nazi invasion of Poland? Would the major powers have invested so much talent and money on the urgent development of an atomic bomb? It is unlikely this question will ever be answered

© Copyright 2025 Books History Library. All Rights Reserved.