The clepsydra is an ancient water clock and serves as the primary metaphor for this examination of Jewish conceptions of time from antiquity to the present. Just as the flow of water is subject to a number of variables such as temperature and pressure; water clocks mark a time that is shifting and relative. Time is not a uniform phenomenon. It is a social construct made of beliefs; scientific knowledge; and political experiment. It is also a story told by theologians; historians; philosophers; and astrophysicists. Consequently; Clepsydra is a cultural history divided in two parts: narrated time and measured time; recounted time and counted time; absolute time and ordered time. It is through this dialog that Sylvie Anne Goldberg challenges the idea of a unified Judeo-Christian time and asks; "What is Jewish time?" She consults biblical and rabbinic sources and refers to medieval and modern texts to understand the different sorts of consciousness of time found in Judaism. In Jewish time; Goldberg argues; past; present; and future are intertwined and comprise one perpetual narrative.
#817244 in Books Stanford University Press 2003-12-09 2003-12-09Original language:EnglishPDF # 1 9.00 x .50 x 6.00l; .65 #File Name: 0804733457179 pages
Review
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful. Paul's ExperienceBy Timothy LavenzTaubes was in an advanced stage of cancer when he gave these lectures in February 1987; just weeks before he died. He could not even stand up to deliver them; and was in the ICU for one of the days of that week. But in spite of these circumstances; or indeed because of them; these talks are incredibly lucid and intellectually rigorous beyond compare. They truly do come across as they are described: as a spiritual testament; charged with an existential urgency; centered around questions that surely animated Taubes throughout his entire life. This book is a testament to that life and these questions. It is scholarly but free-flowing; challenging but often humorous; grounded in facts and yet deeply meditative and personal.No one will doubt the importance of Paul's contribution to the world and to human thought. Love him or hate him; he is there; and the talk about him and his letters does not appear to be dying down anytime soon-- if anything; it's only picking up. But Taubes is not interested in partisan arguments; choosing sides here or there; or in recruiting Paul for his own aims. Taubes has no "agenda" here; he simply wants to get the story straight. To do so; he demands that every theme be thread "through the eye of a philological needle." In other words; he sticks with the text(s); resisting interpretations of Paul that project their own ideas on him or simply follow the standard lines of the Christian church(es). "It's easy to read the story of Paul one-sidedly and to overlook latent elements within him"; he reminds us. "No one understood him; one might say; but then no one completely misunderstood him either." Taubes sticks to these latent elements and tries to understand the misunderstandings. Above all; he is concerned with Paul's experience-- whatever it is that animated his unprecedented spiritual innovations and prompted his politically explosive letters and his new vision of Israel. This means studying in depth how that experience got translated; first into Paul's own Letters; and from there into its countless interpretations (or misunderstandings); from Marcion to Schmitt. But the implicit hypothesis seems to be that Paul's political theology can only be understood beginning from this experience. It is that experience that I think Taubes tried to live (he describes himself as a Paulinist) and to which these talks give body.The first section; "Paul and Moses"; paints a picture of Paul in his historical context as someone concerned above all with the establishment and legitimization of a new people of God; against the Roman and rabbinical powers that were out to separate him from the love of God. We're reminded here that the word "Christian" never once appears in Paul; and that he is really concerned with a new understanding of Israel as "all Israel". In other words; Paul is trying to outbid Moses himself; animated by the same concerns of guilt and atonement. But Paul; against a kinship of the flesh; interprets a kinship of the promise. This kinship is not based in religious; institutional; or worldly things (no Jew; no Greek-- and no Christian!). Nothing in nature; flesh; or "works". Indeed; it is not based in anything immanent; but solely in SPIRIT and LOVE. Taubes points out what is latent in Romans 9:1-3; when Paul tells us that he would have himself accursed from the Messiah; from his people; the covenant; the fathers; etc.; all for the sake of establishing this community in love (i.e.; "all Israel") and to show the true meaning of the "promise" (which amounts to a promise of the transcendence of love and the promise of a new kind of human community). After countless excursus; analyses; and touching anecdotes from his long life; Taubes goes so far as to show how Paul is polemical against Jesus himself; namely in Romans 13:9. In his view; what Paul says there constitutes an "absolutely revolutionary act": he no longer professes the dual commandment of Jesus [love the Lord and love your neighbor; Luke 10:27]; but a single one: "'love thy neighbor as thyself'". Of course; this is just a taste of all that Taubes shares in this first section (which includes some beautiful passages discussing the experience of the Day of Atonement à la Rosenzweig) but ultimately what drives Paul's "political theology" appears to be this: "all members are equal... in pneuma and in agape with one another. Sociologically this means: a new kind of union; a new intimacy is created" (p 52).In the second section; "Paul and Modernity"; Taubes linkes Paul with a whole wealth of thinkers and movements old and new: Marcion; Harnack; Barth; Spinoza; Kierkegaard; Schmitt; Benjamin; Nietzsche; and Freud among others. The last three I've listed appear to be the most important to Taubes in relation to Paul. Romans 8; he tells us; has its strictest parallel in Walter Benjamin's "Theologico-Political Fragment." There; Benjamin writes; "for nature is Messianic by reason of its totally and eternal passing away;" echoing the message in 1 Cor 7:31. He also presents a "nihilistic method" of world politics directly in line with Romans 13. As for Nietzsche; Taubes weaves a web of associations and aversions between him and Paul that truly fascinate; from the critique of the concept of law; to the transvaluation of values; to questions of guilt (which N wants to get rid of); to martyrdom (which N wants Dionysian; anti-Christian); and inspiration (which N wants immanent; atheistic). Taubes refers to him as an "opponent" but for that very reason presents him as incredibly formidable (and as a professor of philosophy; he's quite equipped to do so). But the book ends with an arrow pointing in the opposite direction: to Freud; a direct descendant of Paul in that he teaches us that guilt is constitutive of our human being. The focus is on his Moses And Monotheism; and with that Taubes runs out of time. However; it is clear that both of these figures point toward an "exodus from Biblical religion"; an exodus rooted; strange as it may seem; in Paul and his desire to establish a new community rooted in pneuma and agape. (In my opinion; no matter how strange this will sound to contemporary Christians; it is time to start rereading Paul as the herald of an exit from religion; not as the founder of one.)I should also mention that there is an Appendix which includes letters between Taubes and Schmitt; a bit on their story; and an Afterword written by the editors that takes the book section by section; connecting the dots where Taubes is often only suggestive. The scholarly apparatus; in general; is top notch; and the editors deserve a lot of credit for making this work accessible in book form.Upon completing my review; I feel like I've gotten nowhere near conveying the beauty of this book; and especially nowhere near conveying the sense of "Paul's experience". I believe it takes an encounter with the book; which I hope you will chance. For those interested in a real reading of Paul and the history of the complicated reception of his political theology; as little colored by partisan lenses as possible-- but also rooted; it can't be denied; in the spirit-- this book welcomes you. I would also point you to Giorgio Agamben's The Time That Remains; which takes up many of the themes in this book and is dedicated to Jacob Taubes.3 of 3 people found the following review helpful. Paul without ChristianityBy Lost LacanianJacob Taubes's Political Theology of Paul is one of the thrilling books on Paul I've read in some time.The book is actually transcriptions of lectures Taubes gave toward the end of his life. So if you only have tolerance for linear argument; then this book will probably infuriate you. But; like in the case of the Seminars of Jacques Lacan; those who work through the text will be rewarded with gems of insight.The book has two parts. Part 1 offers "readings" of Romans. In Part 2; Taubes encounters figures of modern thought in light of his Paul.Taubes's project; as far as I see it; is to separate Paul from the Christian institution; to give us a Paul without Christianity. When Paul wrote Romans; Taubes emphasizes; Christianity had not yet been invented. At best; "Christians" were a radical; perhaps heretical; sect of Jews; much like the Essenes or the Zealots. So however we read Paul; we must read him outside the influence of the Church; Taubes argues. I found that following Taubes in this endeavor has led to a refreshing and radical Paul.For those who are following the growing interest in Paul in contemporary critical theory; Taubes's Political Theology of Paul is a must read. It's influence on Agamben's Time That Remains (which is dedicated to Taubes) is apparent. It's interesting to compare Taubes's Paul book with Badiou; Zizek; and others who have written on Paul.0 of 13 people found the following review helpful. GoodBy James HallenbeckI got exactly what I ordered. It came within the timeframe given. The book itself was in great shape. The soft cover wasn't glossy like some publications are.
